Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaskin, Orhun Cig
dc.contributor.authorSen, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Ekrem
dc.contributor.authorSozen, Hamdullah
dc.contributor.authorIlhan, Ridvan
dc.contributor.authorTopuz, Samet
dc.contributor.authorOnder, Semen
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T12:00:35Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T12:00:35Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationTaskin O. C. , Onder S., Topuz S., Sozen H., Sen F., Ilhan R., Yavuz E., "A Selected Immunohistochemical Panel Aids in Differential Diagnosis and Prognostic Stratification of Subtypes of High-grade Endometrial Carcinoma: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Study at a Single Institution", APPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY, cilt.25, sa.10, ss.696-702, 2017
dc.identifier.issn1541-2016
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_2b5664d8-3618-4dd9-aa6f-d4636fe54eb4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/33876
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/pai.0000000000000374
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to investigate whether a selected immunohistochemical panel (estrogen receptor, p53, ARID1A, PPP2R1A, HNF-1) could contribute to the diagnostic process of high-grade endometrial carcinomas (HG-ECs). We also aimed to analyze the correlation of these immunohistochemical results with several morphologic variables and survival data. After revising the diagnosis of 78 HG-ECs, immunohistochemical analysis was performed for each case. After immunohistochemical analysis, a specific diagnosis of prototypic HG-EC was established in most of the cases that were uncertain due to morphologic ambiguity. In the univariate analysis, older patient age, type II morphology, undifferentiated carcinoma and carcinosarcoma type of histology, altered p53 immunostaining, strong membranous staining of PPP2R1A, presence of lymphovascular invasion in serous carcinoma, and microcystic, elongated, and fragmented-type infiltration pattern in endometrioid carcinoma were significantly related to poor prognosis. In the multivariate analysis, only older patient age and carcinosarcoma or undifferentiated/dedifferentiated carcinoma type histology were found to be significantly poor prognostic factors (P=0.011), whereas advanced FIGO stage and type II histology were found to be correlated with poor prognosis, but did not reach statistical significance. We suggest that immunohistochemistry should be used in the differential diagnosis of HG-ECs, especially those with ambiguous morphology. Markers used in this study made a valuable contribution to the diagnostic process as well as prediction of prognosis.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectPatoloji
dc.subjectANATOMİ VE MORFOLOJİ
dc.subjectBiyoloji ve Biyokimya
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri (LIFE)
dc.subjectTIBBİ LABORATUVAR TEKNOLOJİSİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectPATOLOJİ
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectAnatomi
dc.subjectBiyokimya
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectYaşam Bilimleri
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler
dc.titleA Selected Immunohistochemical Panel Aids in Differential Diagnosis and Prognostic Stratification of Subtypes of High-grade Endometrial Carcinoma: A Clinicopathologic and Immunohistochemical Study at a Single Institution
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalAPPLIED IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR MORPHOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume25
dc.identifier.issue10
dc.identifier.startpage696
dc.identifier.endpage702
dc.contributor.firstauthorID56281


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record