Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTanyeri, Hakki
dc.contributor.authorOzel, Sevda
dc.contributor.authorDeniz, Ediz
dc.contributor.authorErgun, Sertan
dc.contributor.authorSaruhanoglu, Alp
dc.contributor.authorOfluoglu, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorKaratasli, Burcin
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T12:55:40Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T12:55:40Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationErgun S., Ofluoglu D., Saruhanoglu A., Karatasli B., Deniz E., Ozel S., Tanyeri H., "Comparative evaluation of various miniplate systems for the repair of mandibular corpus fractures", DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, cilt.33, sa.3, ss.368-372, 2014
dc.identifier.issn0287-4547
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_30e92448-c3e2-4c3e-a887-47afd793aca6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/37331
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-315
dc.description.abstractMiniplates have been used during the last decade to facilitate stability between bony fragments in the maxillofacial region and are currently the preferred surgical method for the fixation of fractures and osteotomies. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the biomechanical behaviors of six different types of miniplates used to reconstruct mandibular body fractures: Group 1 (straight, 2 holes, 12.0 ram spacing), Group 2 (straight, 4 holes, 9.0 spacing), Group 3 (straight, 6 holes, 9.0 mm spacing), Group 4 (L-shaped, 4 holes, 9.0 mm spacing, right hand plate), Group 5 (Y-shaped, 5 holes, 12.0 mm spacing), and Group 6 (double Y-shaped, 6 holes, 9.0 mm spacing). Thirty bovine hemimandibles and a custom-made 3-point biomechanical test frame mounted on a Shimadzu universal test machine were used to evaluate the six different miniplate systems. Results revealed that Group 1 (straight, 2 holes, 12.0 mm spacing) and Group 4 (9.0 mm spacing, right hand plate) had the lowest biomechanical stability, whereas Group 6 (6 holes, 9.0 ram spacing) had the highest biomechanical stability. Group 6 also provided statistically greater resistance to displacement than Group 1 and Group 4.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectMALZEME BİLİMİ, BİYOMATERYAL
dc.subjectMalzeme Bilimi
dc.subjectMühendislik, Bilişim ve Teknoloji (ENG)
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.titleComparative evaluation of various miniplate systems for the repair of mandibular corpus fractures
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalDENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage368
dc.identifier.endpage372
dc.contributor.firstauthorID11069


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster