Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorOcak, Ibrahim
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T14:51:18Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T14:51:18Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationOcak I., "Interaction of longitudinal surface settlements for twin tunnels in shallow and soft soils: the case of Istanbul Metro", ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, cilt.69, sa.5, ss.1673-1683, 2013
dc.identifier.issn1866-6280
dc.identifier.otherav_3bd6c809-c5ed-4a73-9d4b-16d060be4adb
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/44171
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-2002-7
dc.description.abstractIncreasing demands on infrastructures increases the attention on shallow soft ground tunneling methods in urbanized areas. Especially, in metro tunnel excavations, it is important to control the surface settlements observed before and after excavation, which may cause damage to surface structures. To solve this problem, earth pressure balance machines (EPBMs) have widely been used throughout the world. This study focuses on surface settlement measurements, the interaction of twin tunnel surface settlement, and the relationship between shield parameters and surface settlement for parallel tunnels using EPBM shields in clay and sand soils. In this study, the tunnels were excavated using two EPBMs. The tunnels were 6.5 m in diameter, as twin tubes with a 14 m distance from center to center. The EPBM in the first tube followed about 100 m behind the other tube. Segmental lining with 1.4 m of length was employed as a final support. The results from this study showed that (1) the most important parameters for the maximum surface settlements are the face pressure and backfill; (2) in twin tunnel excavation with EPBM for longitudinal profile, the settlement rate reached its peak value when the shield came to the monitoring section and this peak value continued until the shield passed the monitoring section; (3) every shield affected the other tunnel's longitudinal surface settlement profile by approximately 35-36.8 %; (4) S (A), S (B) and S (C) values were found to be 38.0, 35.8 and 26.2 %, respectively for an EPBM, and (5) ensuring good construction quality is a very effective way to control face stability and minimize surface settlement.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTarımsal Bilimler
dc.subjectZiraat
dc.subjectToprak ve Bitki Besleme
dc.subjectToprak ve Su Muhafazası ve Amenajmanı
dc.subjectHavza Yönetimi
dc.subjectÇevre Mühendisliği
dc.subjectJeoloji Mühendisliği
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.subjectSU KAYNAKLARI
dc.subjectJEOLOJİ
dc.subjectTemel Bilimler (SCI)
dc.subjectYerbilimleri
dc.subjectYER BİLİMİ, MULTİDİSİPLİNER
dc.subjectTarım ve Çevre Bilimleri (AGE)
dc.subjectÇevre / Ekoloji
dc.subjectÇEVRE BİLİMLERİ
dc.titleInteraction of longitudinal surface settlements for twin tunnels in shallow and soft soils: the case of Istanbul Metro
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , Mühendislik Fakültesi , Maden Mühendisliği
dc.identifier.volume69
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage1673
dc.identifier.endpage1683
dc.contributor.firstauthorID66198


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster