Show simple item record

Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C)

dc.contributor.authorBese, Tugan
dc.contributor.authorErenel, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorArvas, Macit
dc.contributor.authorSanioglu, Cevdet
dc.contributor.authorDemirkiran, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Evrim
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-03T14:57:26Z
dc.date.available2021-03-03T14:57:26Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citationDemirkiran F., Yavuz E., Erenel H., Bese T., Arvas M., Sanioglu C., "Which is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C)", ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, cilt.286, sa.5, ss.1277-1282, 2012
dc.identifier.issn0932-0067
dc.identifier.otherav_3c60ab63-7e71-40d9-ae9c-2ee0acdec72f
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/44519
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2438-8
dc.description.abstractTo compare diagnostic accuracy and adequacy of pipelle endometrial biopsy with dilatation and curettage.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectKADIN HASTALIKLARI & DOĞUM
dc.titleWhich is the best technique for endometrial sampling? Aspiration (pipelle) versus dilatation and curettage (D&C)
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume286
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage1277
dc.identifier.endpage1282
dc.contributor.firstauthorID206742


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record