Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYazici, Y.
dc.contributor.authorYazici, H.
dc.contributor.authorAdler, N. M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T07:48:14Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T07:48:14Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationYazici Y., Adler N. M. , Yazici H., "Most tumour necrosis factor inhibitor trials in rheumatology are undeservedly called efficacy and safety trials: a survey of power considerations", RHEUMATOLOGY, cilt.47, sa.7, ss.1054-1057, 2008
dc.identifier.issn1462-0324
dc.identifier.otherav_5ff0d27c-9f77-4a59-9182-1865c5dec5df
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/66992
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/ken190
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Many randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are labelled efficacy and safety while due consideration for power is provided only for efficacy outcomes. This in turn necessitates a discussion of the inadequacy of sample size (type II error) for identifying harm. This is particularly important in RCTs of TNF inhibitors as harm related to these agents is still a matter of debate.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectİmmünoloji ve Romatoloji
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectROMATOLOJİ
dc.titleMost tumour necrosis factor inhibitor trials in rheumatology are undeservedly called efficacy and safety trials: a survey of power considerations
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalRHEUMATOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentCity University Of New York Brooklyn College , ,
dc.identifier.volume47
dc.identifier.issue7
dc.identifier.startpage1054
dc.identifier.endpage1057
dc.contributor.firstauthorID188777


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record