dc.contributor.author | Serim, Merve Efe | |
dc.contributor.author | Tuncer, Safa | |
dc.contributor.author | TEKÇE, NESLİHAN | |
dc.contributor.author | Demirci, Mustafa | |
dc.contributor.author | Pala, Kansad | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-04T09:54:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-04T09:54:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | TEKÇE N., Pala K., Tuncer S., Demirci M., Serim M. E. , "Influence of polymerisation method and type of fibre on fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth.", Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc, cilt.43, sa.3, ss.115-122, 2017 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1329-1947 | |
dc.identifier.other | vv_1032021 | |
dc.identifier.other | av_6a949611-8eef-4e0a-ad6a-73172b7d1315 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/73738 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12187 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to investigate (i) the effect of direct or indirect polymerisation of adhesive-impregnated ribbon fibre under 4-mm bulk-filled composites on fracture strength; (ii) to compare polyethylene ribbon fibre-reinforcement composites with short fibre-reinforced composite; and (iii) the effectiveness of polyethylene ribbon fibre according to the restorative materials used (low-viscous bulk-fill composite, high-viscous flowable composite or conventional paste composite). Seventy molars were divided into seven groups; (groups 1-2) Ribbond-reinforced Surefil-SDR; (group 3) Ribbond-reinforced G Aenial Flo; (group 4) Ribbond-reinforced G Aenial Posterior; (group 5) short fibre-reinforced composite everX Posterior; (group 6) unfilled cavity; (group 7) intact teeth. Ribbond was adopted to cavity walls by impregnating an adhesive and using a flowable composite. In group 1, adhesive-impregnated Ribbond was polymerised directly using a light-curing-unit, and indirectly in group 2 under 4-mm bulk-filled composite. Direct or indirect polymerisation of adhesive impregnated ribbon fibre under 4-mm bulk-filled composite did not change the fracture strength results. Polyethylene ribbon fibre-reinforced groups (groups 1-4) and short fibre-reinforced composite group (group 5) displayed similar results. Polyethylene ribbon fibre can be used safely under 4-mm bulk-filled composites. Ribbond-reinforced low-viscous bulk-fill, high-viscous flowable, and conventional paste composite exhibited similar fracture strength results. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp (MED) | |
dc.subject | Sağlık Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp | |
dc.subject | Tıp | |
dc.subject | Diş Hekimliği | |
dc.title | Influence of polymerisation method and type of fibre on fracture strength of endodontically treated teeth. | |
dc.type | Makale | |
dc.relation.journal | Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc | |
dc.contributor.department | Erciyes Üniversitesi , , | |
dc.identifier.volume | 43 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 115 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 122 | |
dc.contributor.firstauthorID | 81870 | |