Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGursoy, Bahar
dc.contributor.authorDevecioglu, Yalçın
dc.contributor.authorAkta, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorKÜRKÇÜ, MEHMET
dc.contributor.authorBenlidayi, Emre
dc.contributor.authorDERGİN, GÜHAN
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T10:22:49Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T10:22:49Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationDERGİN G., Akta M., Gursoy B., Devecioglu Y., KÜRKÇÜ M., Benlidayi E., "Direct Current Electric Stimulation in Implant Osseointegration: An Experimental Animal Study With Sheep", JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, cilt.39, sa.6, ss.671-679, 2013
dc.identifier.issn0160-6972
dc.identifier.otherav_6cddcb7e-64a4-4195-9171-b829bd6d11a2
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/75236
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-d-10-00172
dc.description.abstractIn an effort to obtain a high-quality bone-implant interface, several methods involving alteration of surface morphological, physicochemical, and biochemical properties are being investigated. The aim of our study was to increase the osseointegration rate and quality and decrease the waiting period of dental implants before loading by using a microelectric implant stimulator device. It imitates rnicroelectrical signals, which occur in bone fractures described in terms of piezoelectric theory. A single dental implant (Zimmer Dental), 3.7 mm in diameter, was inserted into the tibia of sheep bilaterally. Twenty-four dental implants were inserted into 12 sheep. Implant on the tibia of each sheep was stimulated with 7.5 mu A direct current (DC), while the other side did not receive any stimulation and served as a control. Animals were sacrificed 1, 2, and 3 months after implantation. Bone segments with implants were processed with unclassified method. The determination of new bone formation and osseointegration around the dental implants was investigated by means of undecalcified method, histomorphologically. No statistically significant difference in bone-to-implant contact (BIC) ratio, osteoblastic activity, and new bone formation was found between the stimulation group and the control group at the late phase of healing (4, 8, and 12 weeks). No evidence was found that electric stimulation with implanted 7.5 mu A DC is effective at late phase implant osseointegration on a sheep experimental model.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.titleDirect Current Electric Stimulation in Implant Osseointegration: An Experimental Animal Study With Sheep
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY
dc.contributor.departmentMarmara Üniversitesi , Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi , Diş Hekimliği Klinik Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume39
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpage671
dc.identifier.endpage679
dc.contributor.firstauthorID64795


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster