Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorOncel, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorSahip, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorKement, Metin
dc.contributor.authorBahadir, Isamettin
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T11:32:44Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T11:32:44Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationBahadir I., Oncel M., Kement M., Sahip Y., "Intra-abdominal use of taurolidine or heparin as alternative products to an antiadhesive barrier (Seprafilm (R)) in adhesion prevention: An experimental study on mice", DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, cilt.50, sa.12, ss.2209-2214, 2007
dc.identifier.issn0012-3706
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_72e18e3e-b20d-4eea-a9f1-e9e82f6893db
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/79048
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9074-6
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: Seprafilm (R) (Genzyme Biosurgery, Cambridge, MA) remains a widely used product in postoperative adhesion prevention. This study was designed to compare the antiadhesive effects of taurolidine, heparin, and Seprafilm (R) in a murine cecal abrasion model. METHODS: Sixty male Balb/c mice underwent a cecal abrasion procedure and were randomized into four groups (n=15 in each). Groups T, H, and S animals intraperitoneally received taurolidine, heparin, and Seprafilm (R), respectively, and Group C animals were reserved as control. Animals were killed on Day 21, and the severity of adhesions was evaluated with a scoring system ranging between 0 to 5. In addition, the localizations of the adhesions were questioned. RESULTS: Five (1 in Group S and 4 in Group H) animals died before they were killed. The deaths were related to intra-abdominal bleeding, and mortality rate was significantly higher in Group H than those in other groups (P < 0.05 for each comparison). The severity of adhesions was significantly less in the study groups than Group C, and in Group H than Groups T and S (P < 0.05 for each comparison). In addition, adhesions located cecum over itself were significantly less in the study groups than the control group, and those between small bowel and cecum were significantly lower in Groups T and S than the control group (P < 0.05 for each comparison). CONCLUSIONS: All products are effective in adhesion prevention. Heparin use provides the best results but may be associated with a higher mortality rate related to intra-abdominal bleeding. Taurolidine may be an alternative product to Seprafilm (R), but further studies are required.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectGastroenteroloji-(Hepatoloji)
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectİç Hastalıkları
dc.subjectDahili Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectCERRAHİ
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectGASTROENTEROLOJİ VE HEPATOLOJİ
dc.titleIntra-abdominal use of taurolidine or heparin as alternative products to an antiadhesive barrier (Seprafilm (R)) in adhesion prevention: An experimental study on mice
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalDISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM
dc.contributor.departmentIstanbul Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar Training & Research Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume50
dc.identifier.issue12
dc.identifier.startpage2209
dc.identifier.endpage2214
dc.contributor.firstauthorID185465


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster