dc.contributor.author | Demirhan, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Kilicoglu, O | |
dc.contributor.author | Atalar, AC | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-03-04T11:44:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-03-04T11:44:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Demirhan M., Atalar A., Kilicoglu O., "Primary fixation strength of rotator cuff repair techniques: A comparative study", ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, cilt.19, sa.6, ss.572-576, 2003 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0749-8063 | |
dc.identifier.other | av_73e21298-d163-4856-9487-a2feffe43046 | |
dc.identifier.other | vv_1032021 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/79662 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00126-9 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: The goal of the study was to compare the primary fixation strength of transosseous suture, suture anchor, and hybrid repair techniques for rotator cuff repair. Type of Study: Animal model experiment. Methods: Thirty-two sheep shoulders were divided into 4 homogeneous groups, according to bone density and tendon dimensions. Infraspinatus tendons were transected from their insertions and reattached using 4 different techniques. Group 1 was repaired with a single Mason-Allen stitch and 2 transosseous tunnels for each end of the suture, knotted on the lateral cortex of proximal humerus; group 2 was repaired with double Mason-Allen stitches and 2 transosseous tunnels; group 3 was repaired with 2 Corkscrews (Arthrex, Germany); and group 4 was repaired with 2 Corkscrews combined with a single Mason-Allen transosseous suture. All specimens were tested for their fixation strengths with a material testing system. Results: The mode of failure in group I was mainly suture breakage. In groups 3 and 4, the tendons pulled out from the sutures. In group 2, sutures broke the bony bridge between the 2 tunnels. The mean load to failure value was 160.31 +/- 34.59 N in group 1, 199.36 +/- 11.73 N in group 2, 108.32 +/- 15.98 N in group 3, and 214.24 +/- 28.52 N in group 4. Anchor fixation was significantly weaker compared with other groups (P < .001). Combination of a transosseous suture and anchor fixation (group 4) was significantly stronger than the single transosseous suture (group 1) and double anchor techniques (group 3) (P < .001). Conclusions: Hybrid technique was the strongest among the tested rotator cuff repair techniques. With the addition of one transosseous suture to two anchors, the strength of the repair could be doubled. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.subject | Sağlık Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri | |
dc.subject | Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji | |
dc.subject | Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler | |
dc.subject | Sosyoloji | |
dc.subject | CERRAHİ | |
dc.subject | Tıp | |
dc.subject | Sosyal Bilimler (SOC) | |
dc.subject | Sosyal Bilimler Genel | |
dc.subject | SPOR BİLİMLERİ | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp (MED) | |
dc.subject | Klinik Tıp | |
dc.subject | ORTOPEDİ | |
dc.title | Primary fixation strength of rotator cuff repair techniques: A comparative study | |
dc.type | Makale | |
dc.relation.journal | ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY | |
dc.contributor.department | , , | |
dc.identifier.volume | 19 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 572 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 576 | |
dc.contributor.firstauthorID | 168930 | |