Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOzsoy, Huseyin Ozkal
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz Ozsoy, Cigdem
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T13:49:36Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T13:49:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationOzsoy H. O. , Yilmaz Ozsoy C., "PRODUCT DESIGN CONCEPT EVALUATION BY USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY AND ANALYTICAL NETWORK PROCESSES", METU JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE, cilt.35, sa.2, ss.119-146, 2018
dc.identifier.issn0258-5316
dc.identifier.otherav_7e70ad07-130b-4c85-979b-bb2fc4062654
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/86344
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4305/metu.jfa.2018.2.8
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to improve the success and efficiency of the design concept evaluation and selection activity in industrial design by adapting two specialized evaluation-selection methods to the design process and comparatively demonstrating their use. The methods are called the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Analytic Network Process (ANP). In their application, first the main design objective is decided upon and the evaluation criteria are determined accordingly, followed by the listing of the design concept alternatives. Then the criteria's importance values as well as relations between them are investigated and evaluation of the alternatives is done according to the criteria by using the tools provided by the methods. The application presented in the article evaluates seven hand cart designs by using the two methods. First the tasks that are common in both methods, then the tasks specific to each method are explained. The general criteria to be used in the evaluation are identified and the effects of these criteria on the evaluation process are determined through interviews with designers and users participating in the study. Then the relative performance rankings of the available seven hand cart alternatives are calculated by using both methods. Numerical results are listed in a descending order to show the success levels of the design concepts, pointing to the one that received the highest overall performance. The findings obtained from two methods are comparatively interpreted.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectSanat ve Beşeri Bilimler (AHCI)
dc.subjectSanat
dc.subjectMİMARİ
dc.subjectSanat ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectİç Mimarlık
dc.titlePRODUCT DESIGN CONCEPT EVALUATION BY USING ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY AND ANALYTICAL NETWORK PROCESSES
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalMETU JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE
dc.contributor.departmentMimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage119
dc.identifier.endpage146
dc.contributor.firstauthorID249458


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record