Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYengin, Esengn
dc.contributor.authorBaca, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorGokcen-Rohlig, Bilge
dc.contributor.authorSato, Suichi
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T14:02:55Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T14:02:55Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.citationBaca E., Yengin E., Gokcen-Rohlig B., Sato S., "In vivo evaluation of occlusalcontact area and maximum bite force in patients with various types of implant-supported prostheses", ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, cilt.71, sa.5, ss.1181-1187, 2013
dc.identifier.issn0001-6357
dc.identifier.otherav_7f808639-ca3f-4015-92c6-dfafcefa15ee
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/87024
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2012.757360
dc.description.abstractObjective. To determine the effects of various implant retained and/or supported prostheses on number of occlusal contacts (NOC), occlusal contact area (OCA) and maximum bite force (BF). Patients and methods: In total, 56 patients were included in the study; five test groups and two control groups. The patients in the treatment groups received implant-supported/retained prosthesis; over-dentures retained with two individual attachments in occlusion with complete denture, with four individual attachments in occlusion with complete denture, with four individual attachments in occlusion with fixed partial dentures or natural dentition, 6-implant retained fixed bridges in occlusion with natural dentition and 8-implant retained fixed bridges in occlusion with natural dentition. The patients in control group 1 were wearing conventional complete maxillary and mandibular dentures, whereas in control group 2 they had fixed full-arch porcelain-fused to metal restorations prostheses for both arches. Dental Pre-scale was used measure the NOC, BF and OCA. Results. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment and control groups, among the groups with regards to NOC. OCA demonstrated different results among the removable and fixed reconstruction groups. With regards to BF, removable dentures supported with four implants showed higher bite force values than controls and two implant over-dentures. Also, a fixed reconstruction using eight implants showed higher BF values than a fixed reconstruction using six implants. Conclusion. Use of implants for removable dentures and fixed reconstructions improve occlusal contact area and bite force.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.titleIn vivo evaluation of occlusalcontact area and maximum bite force in patients with various types of implant-supported prostheses
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume71
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.startpage1181
dc.identifier.endpage1187
dc.contributor.firstauthorID71954


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record