Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSerin, Merdan
dc.contributor.authorAltindas, Muzaffer
dc.contributor.authorBiltekin, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Ugur
dc.contributor.authorAltinel, Dincer
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T14:05:57Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T14:05:57Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationAltinel D., Biltekin B., Serin M., Sahin U., Altindas M., "Comparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model", INDIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, cilt.51, sa.2, ss.196-201, 2018
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_7fc1fdcc-56ce-4724-8ed3-aa476dc6cf93
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/87175
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/ijps.ijps_28_17
dc.description.abstractBackground: In this study, we investigated the subdermal and perforator delay phenomena as a method to improve flap survival. Materials and Methods: In this experimental study, we used 24 rats in three groups. In the control group, the dorsal flaps were elevated and reinserted back to their place. In the experimental groups, we practiced the delay phenomena with two different techniques. In the first experimental group, cranial and lateral side incisions were performed; however, the flaps were not cut-off from the underlying fascia. In the second experimental group, we placed a silicon sheet under the planned flap to cut-off the circulation from the perforator vessels. Four weeks after the delay procedure, the flaps were raised completely and reinserted back to their place. Results: The average of necrotic area in the control group was 21.9% (+/- 7.70). There was no necrosis in both experimental groups (P < 0.0001). Histological examination revealed that collagen density in both of the experimental groups was increased in comparison to the control group, it has only been found a significant first experimental group (P = 0.0315). We have not found any significant difference in lymphocyte density between the groups. Angiographic imaging has showed an increase in the vascular density in the flaps of the first experimental group. Conclusion: We believe that both of these delay techniques can be adapted to clinical applications and used safely to increase flap survival.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectCerrahi Tıp Bilimleri
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectCERRAHİ
dc.titleComparison of subdermal and perforator delay techniques on a rat flap model
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalINDIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY
dc.contributor.departmentIstanbul Training & Research Hospital , ,
dc.identifier.volume51
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage196
dc.identifier.endpage201
dc.contributor.firstauthorID253072


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster