Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTimor, Mehpare
dc.contributor.authorErdin, Ceren
dc.contributor.authorÖzkaya, Gökhan
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T14:08:32Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T14:08:32Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationÖzkaya G., Timor M., Erdin C., "Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Indicators and Comparisons of Countries through a Hybrid Model of Data Mining and MCDM Methods", Sustainability, cilt.13, sa.2, ss.694-743, 2021
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.otherav_80025c6b-9791-420b-b26b-8388e15cf39c
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/87339
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/su13020694
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/2/694
dc.description.abstractScience, technology and innovation (STI) policies are of great importance for countries to reach their sustainable development goals. Numerous global databases have many indicators that measure and compare the performance of STI policies of countries. However, many problems arise regarding how to identify, classify and systematically analyze these indicators in order to measure, monitor and improve the performance of STI. The study includes a literature review on global problems and new trends in STI policies, while mentioning the necessity of an internationally comparable STI indicator set, current STI indicator studies and efforts, and studies for each continent. In light of these, all the indicators selected are introduced in detail. The strengths and weaknesses of the countries in the study in terms of evaluation indicator values are indicated. After determining the indicator weights objectively with the entropy method, 40 countries are compared with TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE I-II, ARAS, COPRAS, MULTIMOORA, ELECTRE, SAW and MAUT methods. In addition, countries that show similarities with each other are evaluated by cluster analysis, which is one of the data mining classification methods. This study offers a new and original approach with MCDM methods on this subject. Considering all the results obtained in the study together, these rankings are compared among themselves and with the rankings specified in the Global Innovation (2019) and Global Competitiveness (2019) indices, and it is seen that the results are consistent. In addition, it is possible to update and publish this study every year with updated data.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectStrategy and Management
dc.subjectGeneral Business, Management and Accounting
dc.subjectSayısal Yöntemler
dc.subjectİşletme
dc.subjectSosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler
dc.subjectYÖNETİM
dc.subjectİŞ
dc.subjectEkonomi ve İş
dc.subjectBusiness and International Management
dc.subjectMarketing
dc.subjectSocial Sciences & Humanities
dc.subjectGeneral Decision Sciences
dc.subjectDecision Sciences (miscellaneous)
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler (SOC)
dc.titleScience, Technology and Innovation Policy Indicators and Comparisons of Countries through a Hybrid Model of Data Mining and MCDM Methods
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalSustainability
dc.contributor.departmentYıldız Teknik Üniversitesi , İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fak. , İşletme Bölümü
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage694
dc.identifier.endpage743
dc.contributor.firstauthorID2506447


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record