Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorDabanoğlu, Alp
dc.contributor.authorDorter, Can
dc.contributor.authorKoray, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorGömeç, Yavuz
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-02T20:54:57Z
dc.date.available2021-03-02T20:54:57Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.identifier.citationGömeç Y., Dorter C., Dabanoğlu A., Koray F., "Effect of resin-based material combination on the compressive and the flexural strength", JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, cilt.32, sa.2, ss.122-127, 2005
dc.identifier.issn0305-182X
dc.identifier.otherav_04651954-035a-43ec-982e-9ed516e2b5b6
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/8880
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01394.x
dc.description.abstractThe mechanical properties, elasticity and compressive strength, of restorative materials play a crucial role during mastication for clinical performance of materials in particular stress bearing areas at posterior regions. This in vitro study was objected to evaluate the changes in the compressive and flexural strength of tooth-coloured resin-based dental restorations placed on flowable composites. Specimens in the control group were produced in cylindrical form for testing compressive strength and in quadrangular prism form for flexural strength test. Tetric Ceram, Charisma, Surefil, Admira and two compomers; Dyract AP and Compoglass F in test group specimens were fabricated by placing the control materials on different flowables. The material combinations were as follows: Tetric Ceram/Tetric Flow Charisma/Flowline, Surefil/Dyract Flow, Admira/Admira Flow, Dyract AP/Dyract Flow, Compoglass F/Compoglass Flow. Compressive strength values were measured at the Instron Testing Machine with a cross-head speed of 10 mm min(-1) while flexural strength were determined in three-point bending with a cross-head speed of 1 mm min(-1). One-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison tests were performed for the statistical analysis. The flexural strength values of Tetric Ceram/Tetric Flow (135.9 +/- 3.2), Charisma/Flowline (120.4 +/- 5.6) and Compoglass F/Compoglass Flow (108.2 +/- 5.2) combinations were statistically greater than Tetric Ceram (110.8 +/- 10.5), Charisma (95.3 +/- 5.3) and Compoglass F (86.9 +/- 4.9). The results of the present study support the idea that the placement of flowable composite as a liner under the resin-based composite restoratives increase the flexural strength.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp (MED)
dc.subjectSağlık Bilimleri
dc.subjectDİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ, ORAL CERRAHİ VE TIP
dc.subjectKlinik Tıp
dc.subjectTıp
dc.subjectDiş Hekimliği
dc.titleEffect of resin-based material combination on the compressive and the flexural strength
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
dc.contributor.departmentİstanbul Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume32
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage122
dc.identifier.endpage127
dc.contributor.firstauthorID30851


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster