Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorPeker, Oya Oztan
dc.contributor.authorKadaifciler, Duygu Goksay
dc.contributor.authorGungor, NİHAL
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-04T18:01:42Z
dc.date.available2021-03-04T18:01:42Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationGungor N., Kadaifciler D. G. , Peker O. O. , "Investigation of the bacterial load and antibiotic susceptibility of dental units", ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, cilt.186, ss.1847-1853, 2014
dc.identifier.issn0167-6369
dc.identifier.otherav_8895a777-2219-407b-99bc-c16be76dae7d
dc.identifier.othervv_1032021
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12627/92669
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3498-3
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the bacterial contamination level and to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of the isolated bacteria from dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) in Istanbul. Bacterial quality of DUWLs is very important, as patients and dental staff are regularly exposed to water and aerosols generated by the unit. If opportunistic pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Legionella pneumophila are present in DUWLs, patient and dental staff can be infected. One hundred water samples were collected from high-speed drills and input waters from 50 dental units. Aerobic heterotrophic bacteria counts and the presence of Legionella, Pseudomonas, oral streptococci, and Staphylococcus were investigated in dental unit waters and aerosol samples. In addition, the antibiotic susceptibility of the isolated and identified bacteria from DUWLs was examined. This research found that 37 out of 50 dental unit water samples exceeded the American Dental Association's limit of 200 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL(-1). Legionella, oral streptococci, and S. aureus were not detected in any water or aerosol samples, but P. aeruginosa was isolated in three DUWLs. Also, Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus were found in water and aerosol samples. Cefoperazone, ofloxacin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, and piperacillin were the most effective antibiotics against the isolated bacteria from DUWLs.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectTarım ve Çevre Bilimleri (AGE)
dc.subjectÇevre Mühendisliği
dc.subjectÇEVRE BİLİMLERİ
dc.subjectÇevre / Ekoloji
dc.subjectTarımsal Bilimler
dc.subjectMühendislik ve Teknoloji
dc.titleInvestigation of the bacterial load and antibiotic susceptibility of dental units
dc.typeMakale
dc.relation.journalENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
dc.contributor.departmentYeditepe Üniversitesi , ,
dc.identifier.volume186
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage1847
dc.identifier.endpage1853
dc.contributor.firstauthorID79336


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster